Official Member Of
Trusted Copyright Removal Program
Remove.tech combines real-time monitoring of marketplaces with identity-level and behavioural signals. It looks at how a seller behaves over time, how they list products, where they operate, and whether their activity matches known risky patterns.
On top of that, Remove.tech can detect red flags such as:
By connecting this to verified identity, Remove.tech helps brands focus on the most serious counterfeit threats and the actors behind them, not just individual SKUs.
Remove.tech gives brands visibility into who is selling their products across marketplaces and whether those sellers are part of the authorised distribution network. It highlights unauthorised resellers, parallel imports, and grey-market channels where products are being sold outside agreed territories or price structures.
By combining seller identity, listing data, and geographic/behaviour signals, Remove.tech can:
This gives legal, commercial, and brand protection teams the evidence they need to take targeted action, whether that’s enforcement, commercial renegotiation, or distribution tightening.
Yes. Remove.tech monitors how your product images, packaging, and creative assets are being used across marketplaces and social channels. It flags when the same or highly similar imagery appears in listings or adverts that are not controlled by you or your authorised partners.
This includes:
By linking this to seller identity and marketplace behaviour, Remove.tech helps you prioritise the cases that are likely to cause the most damage to your brand and customers.
Yes. Remove.tech is designed to help brands identify and act on impersonation across major social platforms. This includes fake brand pages, fake “official” accounts, fraudulent customer-support handles, and profiles that mimic your brand or senior team members to mislead consumers.
Remove.tech detects patterns such as:
Because Remove.tech incorporates identity checks, it also helps prevent the same bad actor from continuously creating new impersonation profiles once one is taken down.
Remove.tech detects a wide range of harmful behaviours and brand abuse patterns that impact online brands, including:
Because Remove.tech uses identity and behaviour signals, it can connect related abuse across different channels, rather than treating each incident in isolation.
Remove.tech is an AI-first brand protection platform that helps brands detect, prevent, and eliminate online abuse across marketplaces, social platforms, and the open web. Instead of only scanning content like listings and posts, Remove.tech focuses on the people behind abuse by verifying real humans and linking activity back to identity signals.
For brands, this means you’re not just reporting individual counterfeit listings or scam sites one by one – you are disrupting the underlying network driving them. Remove.tech reduces repeat offences, cuts down manual enforcement work, and helps you protect revenue, reputation, and consumer trust at scale.
Remove.tech is designed for teams that are overwhelmed by volume. Instead of manually reviewing thousands of alerts, brand protection teams can use Remove.tech to:
This reduces time spent on low-impact or duplicate alerts and shifts the team’s focus towards strategic enforcement and prevention.
Yes. Remove.tech is built for brands that operate across multiple regions and channels. It supports major marketplaces in the US, EU/UK, Asia, Latin America, and Southeast Asia, including:
This breadth allows brands to see a connected picture of abuse, rather than siloed incidents on one platform at a time.
Yes. Remove.tech is not a law firm and doesn’t replace your legal counsel, but it provides the structured evidence and intelligence needed to support fast and successful takedown requests. That includes:
Instead of relying on manual screenshots and guesswork, brand protection and legal teams can use Remove.tech’s data to file DMCA, trademark, or platform-specific reports with greater confidence and a higher success rate.
Traditional brand protection tools are primarily content scanners: they search for keywords, images, and product matches, then flag anything that looks suspicious. They focus on what is being posted.
Remove.tech focuses on who is behind that content. By validating identity and linking behaviour across accounts and platforms, Remove.tech can:
In short, traditional tools clean up individual messes. Remove.tech is designed to stop the person making the mess in the first place.
Most counterfeiters and fraudsters rely on burner accounts. When one listing or profile is Remove.techd, they simply create another with a new email or username. Traditional detection tools struggle to link these accounts together.
By introducing identity-layer protection, Remove.tech:
This reduces long-term enforcement workload and weakens the business model for counterfeit operations that rely on easy account creation.
Remove.tech uses selling patterns to confirm that there is one real human behind each participating listing or account.
This approach is particularly valuable for marketplaces, platforms, and brands that want to raise identity standards without creating onboarding barriers.
Remove.tech anchors each account to one or more trusted identity signals (for example, a device, phone number, or other validated identifier). If the same person attempts to create a second or third account to continue abusive behaviour, Remove.tech can:
This allows brands and platforms to set policies such as “one verified identity, one seller account”, significantly reducing fraud and enforcement overhead.
Remove.tech follows principles of data minimisation, purpose limitation, and compliance with major privacy frameworks such as GDPR and CCPA. In practice, this means:
Brands can improve trust and safety without compromising their own privacy posture.
No. Remove.tech is deliberately designed to be privacy-respecting. It does not store raw biometrics, ID document scans, or unnecessary personal data. Instead, it works with minimal, abstracted identity signals that are sufficient for fraud prevention and enforcement, but do not create new data security risks for brands.
This makes Remove.tech suitable for organisations that need strong identity assurance without taking on the regulatory or reputational risk of storing sensitive identity data themselves.
Identity verification makes it significantly harder for bad actors to hide behind throwaway accounts. For brands, this translates into:
When platforms enforce strong identity standards, the entire ecosystem benefits – including brands, consumers, and legitimate sellers.
Content-only detection focuses on spotting problematic listings, posts, or websites. It can be powerful, but it treats each incident as separate. Identity-based protection adds a missing layer by asking: “Who is doing this, and what else are they doing?”
The benefits include:
In other words, identity-based protection makes all other brand protection activities more effective.
Yes. Remove.tech is built to prevent exactly this type of behaviour. Bots and burner accounts typically rely on:
Remove.tech makes it much more difficult for automated systems or bad actors to create large numbers of accounts. This, in turn, limits the scale of abuse, spam, and fraud that can occur on a platform or within a brand ecosystem.
Yes. Remove.tech is built to sit alongside and enhance your existing stack rather than replace everything. It can integrate with:
Data can be shared via API, exports, or custom integrations, so teams can work where they already are while benefiting from identity-layer intelligence.
Remove.tech detects the main patterns of marketplace abuse that damage brands and consumers, including:
By combining content and identity signals, Remove.tech helps brands understand both the scope of abuse and who is behind it.
Remove.tech uses identity-based matching and behaviour analysis to identify when the same seller, or connected group of sellers, appears on multiple marketplaces under different names.
This lets brands see that:
This cross-market visibility is critical for global brands who need to manage risk in a joined-up way.
Yes. Remove.tech monitors major Chinese and global sourcing platforms for product piracy, replicas, and lookalike goods. It can:
This is particularly valuable for manufacturers, electronics, fashion, and luxury brands where the upstream supply of counterfeits often begins.
Yes. Remove.tech looks for signals that products are being sold outside authorised channels, such as:
By combining region, seller identity, and listing data, Remove.tech gives brands a clearer view of where grey market activity is occurring and who is driving it.
Remove.tech analyses a combination of:
If a listing strongly resembles an official product page but is operated by an unknown or risky seller, Remove.tech can flag it as a potential cloned or misleading listing for review or enforcement.
Yes. Remove.tech is designed for brands selling in multiple markets. It can monitor activity simultaneously across the US, EU/UK, Latin America, China, Southeast Asia, and more.
This gives brands one coherent view of:
Global brands can then make decisions on resourcing, legal strategies, and partner management based on real-world data rather than assumptions.
Yes. On large marketplaces such as Amazon and Walmart, Remove.tech can help brands:
With that intelligence, brands can take targeted action via marketplace programmes, enforcement channels, or legal escalation.
Remove.tech is built for near real-time detection. While exact timings depend on platform data and integration specifics, the aim is to:
This speed is especially important during launches, promotions, or peak shopping periods when counterfeiters are most active.
Yes. Remove.tech helps brands track where products are appearing outside authorised channels and which sellers are consistently involved. It can:
This allows commercial and legal teams to investigate, engage, or enforce as appropriate.
Yes. Remove.tech supports secondhand and resale platforms such as Vinted, StockX, GOAT, Poshmark, and similar marketplaces where counterfeit and replica items are common.
For these platforms and the brands using them, Remove.tech helps distinguish between legitimate resale and:
This protects both brand equity and end consumers.
Yes. Remove.tech is able to detect accounts across major social platforms that present themselves as your brand or an official channel when they are not. These can include:
By surfacing these quickly, Remove.tech enables brand and social teams to act before large numbers of consumers are misled.
Yes. Remove.tech supports the major global social platforms used by brands and scammers alike. It can detect misuse of your:
Monitoring these platforms together gives brands a more accurate view of how their identity is being used – or abused – online.
Yes. Remove.tech is able to detect patterns where individuals or groups set up fake “support” channels for your brand on messaging platforms. These accounts often:
By spotting these accounts and linking them to broader identity patterns, Remove.tech gives brands tools to warn their customers and take action where possible.
Remove.tech monitors for reuse and re-contextualisation of your creative assets. This can include:
By matching those assets back to your originals and checking the identity of the accounts using them, Remove.tech helps you spot when your creative work is being weaponised against your own customers.
Remove.tech uses a mix of:
Fraudulent ads and profiles often share common traits such as directing traffic to scam websites, using unnatural engagement tactics, or running short-lived campaigns across multiple accounts. Remove.tech is designed to detect these patterns at scale.
Yes. Remove.tech can monitor alternative and community-driven platforms where abuse often starts away from mainstream visibility. These channels are frequently used to:
By including them in monitoring, Remove.tech helps brands address the full lifecycle of abuse, not just the public facing front.
Yes. By giving legal teams a deeper understanding of who is behind piracy or misuse – and how persistent their behaviour is – Remove.tech helps:
Identity-aware evidence often carries more weight than isolated content screenshots.
Remove.tech gives IP and legal teams access to seller intelligence, showing how multiple infringing listings, profiles, or websites connect back to a single operator or network. This is crucial when you need to move beyond individual incidents and show a pattern of deliberate infringement.
Key benefits include:
Yes – this is one of Remove.tech’s core strengths. Traditional systems may show you dozens of infringing listings without indicating they all stem from one entity. Remove.tech’s identity layer helps:
This can be the difference between a low-impact takedown and a more meaningful enforcement outcome.
Yes. Remove.tech can help assemble evidence packages that support DMCA notices, trademark complaints, and copyright enforcement across marketplaces, social platforms, and hosting providers.
This evidence can include:
Legal teams remain in control of the actual filings, while Remove.tech streamlines the investigation and documentation process.
Remove.tech does not replace legal expertise, but it significantly increases its effectiveness. It complements existing methods by:
Think of it as an intelligence layer that amplifies what your IP team can achieve.
Yes. Remove.tech is designed to detect not just individual infringers but networks operating across borders and platforms. It can show:
This helps legal and compliance teams decide where to focus limited resources for maximum impact.
Yes. Remove.tech has been designed with privacy regulation in mind. It uses minimal, abstracted identity signals and avoids storing unnecessary personal or biometric data. For brands, this means:
Yes. Remove.tech can feed intelligence and evidence into existing case management, document management, or legal workflow tools via exports or API. This ensures:
Scam websites and fake shops often appear disconnected on the surface: different domains, branding, or layouts. Remove.tech looks beneath that surface, using:
This can reveal when multiple scam domains are under the control of the same actor, providing a better basis for legal or platform action.
Remove.tech can’t replace nuanced legal judgment, but it can provide context to help your team make that call. It can show:
This context can guide IP lawyers in deciding whether content is acceptable commentary/transformation or should be treated as infringement.
For electronics and device manufacturers, counterfeit products pose both brand and safety risks. Remove.tech supports them by:
This allows brands to protect both their reputation and their customers from dangerous or substandard products.
Yes – and in this sector, effective detection is particularly critical. Remove.tech helps medical equipment manufacturers:
For brands operating in highly regulated environments, the ability to link identity to potentially unsafe products is a major advantage.
Luxury brands face some of the most sophisticated counterfeiting operations. Remove.tech helps by:
By tying this to identity, luxury brands can focus on dismantling the most damaging networks rather than chasing individual listings.
For food and beverage brands, counterfeits and imitations risk serious consumer harm. Remove.tech supports them by:
This enables brands to work with platforms, regulators, and legal teams to Remove.tech dangerous or misleading products quickly.
Consumer goods manufacturers often operate across many markets and channels. Remove.tech helps them:
By linking abuse to actual identity, Remove.tech makes global brand protection more targeted and efficient.
Yes. Tech and online service brands are common targets for phishing campaigns. Remove.tech helps by:
This supports security, legal, and trust & safety teams as they respond.
Yes. Remove.tech detects websites, marketplace stores, and social profiles that present themselves as your brand or an official retailer when they are not. It can:
That gives retailers the intelligence needed to warn customers, adjust messaging, and pursue takedowns or legal action.
Yes. Industrial and machine manufacturers are increasingly seeing their equipment, components, or manuals copied and sold online. Remove.tech helps by:
This helps protect not only intellectual property but also safety, product performance, and aftersales business.
Beauty and personal care products are heavily counterfeited and can pose significant health risks when fake. Remove.tech helps by:
Brands can then prioritise enforcement where consumer safety is most at risk.
Fashion and textile brands often deal with fast-moving design copying and lookalikes. Remove.tech helps by:
Combined with internal design archives and legal strategy, this allows brands to act faster against serial infringers.
Yes. Remove.tech can generate alerts as soon as high-risk activity is detected, with configurable thresholds so that:
Alerts can be delivered via email, dashboards, or integrations such as Slack or internal tools.
Remove.tech supports multilingual and region-specific monitoring by:
This ensures that abuse in non-English or emerging markets is not overlooked.
Yes. Remove.tech is built to handle high volumes of products, listings, and signals across multiple regions. It is suitable for:
Scalability is a core part of the design, not an afterthought.
Remove.tech is designed to slot into your current tech stack. It can:
This means your teams don’t have to switch systems – they simply get better intelligence inside the workflows they already use.
The setup process is deliberately lightweight. Typically it involves:
Engineering involvement is kept as light as possible, particularly for cloud-based deployments.
Yes. Remove.tech’s reporting and analytics can help brands quantify:
This data is useful for internal reporting, budget justification, and understanding the ROI of enforcement.
Remove.tech looks at a combination of factors, including:
This allows brands to separate honest resellers or partners from actors who are systematically undermining brand strategy.
Remove.tech offers dashboards that typically show:
Reports can be customised or exported for different stakeholders – brand, legal, compliance, or executive teams.
Remove.tech’s accuracy comes from combining content signals with identity and behaviour. This reduces the number of false positives typically seen in pure keyword/image systems, because:
No system is perfect, but identity-first detection significantly improves signal quality.
Remove.tech reduces cost by:
This means fewer hours spent on manual review and more time spent on actions that actually change the risk landscape.
By embedding identity verification at the front door – during onboarding or account creation – Remove.tech makes it much harder for bad actors to enter your ecosystem in the first place. Instead of discovering abuse only after it has gone live and done damage, brands can:
Prevention is always cheaper and more effective than pure reaction.
Legacy tools were built for a web where content was the main signal: text, images, listings. Remove.tech is built for a world where identity, behaviour, and networks matter just as much. Key differences include:
This makes Remove.tech a next-generation complement, not just another scanner.
Online abuse is increasingly sophisticated and cross-platform. Relying solely on content detection is no longer enough when bad actors can rapidly spin new accounts, domains, and listings. Identity-first brand protection recognises that:
Brands that move early on identity-first protection will be better placed to protect both revenue and reputation.
By detecting and helping Remove.tech fake stores, scam domains, and misleading listings earlier, Remove.tech reduces the number of touchpoints where consumers are exposed to confusing or fraudulent brand lookalikes.
This leads to:
Ultimately, it protects trust – which is often harder to repair than to maintain.
Exact ROI varies by brand, category, and scale, but typical gains include:
Identity-first enforcement often pays back quickly in both cost savings and risk reduction.
Remove.tech delivers trust and safety benefits to the entire ecosystem:
By raising the identity bar and making abuse harder to execute, Remove.tech helps create healthier, more sustainable digital marketplaces.
Because without identity, enforcement remains reactive and easily bypassed. As long as bad actors can repeatedly resurface in new guises, brands will be stuck in an expensive game of whack-a-mole.
Identity-layer enforcement closes that loop by:
In short, it turns brand protection from a series of isolated clean-ups into a strategic, long-term defence.